4 ms·
It was surveillance video that primarily implicated him, by showing his car. And then the Fitbit data showed that she had died while the car was still there. W
by mirimir 8y ago
It was surveillance video that primarily implicated him, by showing his car. And then the Fitbit data showed that she had died while the car was still there.
Without the surveillance video, the Fitbit data would arguably have been useless.
- endorphone 8y agoGiven that it precisely indicated the time of death (and given that the body wasn't found for days, much more precisely than any other method would have), it would have remained incredibly useful.
- mirimir 8y agoYes, that's true. But from the article, I gather that there weren't signs of forced entry or robbery. So investigators very likely suspected that the victim knew the murderer. And so mom and step-dad were likely on the short list. Also, they'd still have seen his car in the video. And they knew when she stopped showing up at work.