> it seems to me that theories that remove the need for dark energy are researched, and welcomed rather than mocked I don’t think that clarifying this 1) is st

> it seems to me that theories that remove the need for dark energy are researched, and welcomed rather than mocked I don’t think that clarifying this 1) is structural to their process, 2) what the process is and 3) a contrasting example of “knowledge” that also covers the same topics but without this process is a sidetrack. This isn’t an outlying case and all scientists _should_ have this view of contrasting hypothesis. This is obviously in contrast to religion.