4 ms·
Can somebody explain why GM would want to provide competitive advantage to its competitor for a fixed price? Either GM has licensing fees in its future, or the
by cjhanks 8y ago
Can somebody explain why GM would want to provide competitive advantage to its competitor for a fixed price?
Either GM has licensing fees in its future, or the project is proving to be too capital intensive. Or could there be an effort towards a consortium?
Most of the major talent in the field is gainfully employed. I simply do not fully understand the objective of all of this capital raising. I look forward to better understanding the strategy in the rear view mirror.
- cmrdporcupine 8y agoGM has provided engines for other manufacturers for years, so is it really that different?
- sjg007 8y agoHonda cars and gm trucks
- wittyusername 8y agoI think one issue is that, like VR, one bad actor sours the consumer appetite for the entire concept. I think a safer road for GM is to become the de facto A+ supplier of tech that works well than for 2/3 of the legacy industry to have janky half-working sorta-dangerous solutions in 2025.