3 ms·
It wasn't a hoax. It's a confounding detail that a meta-commentary article is employing.
by ArchTypical 8y ago
It wasn't a hoax. It's a confounding detail that a meta-commentary article is employing.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoSorry, I can't parse that at all. Could you be a bit clearer on what you're trying to say here?
- ArchTypical 8y agoThe article is attempting to explain the events, by characterizing them as a type of deception when it shows the exact opposite (it's not a hoax that papers are accepted on political aim, rather than evidence). It's a small detail, but telling as to the intent and voracity without knowing most the story.