37 ms·
To be fair, physicists are quite aware of that. I'm no expert but it seems to me that theories that remove the need for dark energy are researched, and welcomed
by williamdclt 8y ago
To be fair, physicists are quite aware of that. I'm no expert but it seems to me that theories that remove the need for dark energy are researched, and welcomed rather than mocked. Nobody is satisfied with this dark matter/energy need (especially when we know for a fact that our current fundamental theories are wrong)
- aplummer 8y agoThe primary difference between the scientific method and religion / dogma
- simonh 8y agoEven as an atheist this wound me up. Please don't sidetrack the conversation.
- aplummer 8y ago> it seems to me that theories that remove the need for dark energy are researched, and welcomed rather than mocked I don’t think that clarifying this 1) is structural to their process, 2) what the process is and 3) a contrasting example of “knowledge” that also covers the same topics but without this process is a sidetrack. This isn’t an outlying case and all scientists _should_ have this view of contrasting hypothesis. This is obviously in contrast to religion.