4 ms·
It's bad both ways: having these news creates sort of unconstructive discussion, but removing it creates a perception of bias/censorship. I think between these
by cft 8y ago
It's bad both ways: having these news creates sort of unconstructive discussion, but removing it creates a perception of bias/censorship.
I think between these two bad options not removing them is a better option: news of this magnitude are rare and it will blow away after a few days. It relates to California corporate law and thus is pertinent to HN nevertheless I think.
- dang 8y agoThanks for the thoughtful reply. No question it's pertinent. I'm not sure we need a fourth thread though. Re perception of bias/censorship: that's a tough one. This perception arises no matter what we do; there seems to be no way to avoid it.