I don't think that's a bad thing. Allowing the social mores of the wealthy to continue driving society generations later is at best aristocratic. When we die, o

I don't think that's a bad thing. Allowing the social mores of the wealthy to continue driving society generations later is at best aristocratic. When we die, our influence should die with us, at least to the extent that later generations no longer share our present moral inclinations. A foundation that wants to live in perpetuity should have to continually refresh itself with the dollars of later generations. edit: typo