The Hypatia article that got accepted was notoriously mild in comparison to many of the others, if you look at the summary: > Thesis: That academic hoaxes or o

The Hypatia article that got accepted was notoriously mild in comparison to many of the others, if you look at the summary: > Thesis: That academic hoaxes or other forms of satirical or ironic critique of social justice scholarship are unethical, characterized by ignorance and rooted in a desire to preserve privilege. This is obviously something that can be argued, even taking this very same project as an example! But for the authors to claim that the position is absurd begs the question in favor of their project. That looks disingenuous to me.