3 ms·

> Halfway in the page it becomes obvious it's a hit piece to promote the author's book. Uh... that's a joke. FTA: > By the way, an amusing aside: a few year

> Halfway in the page it becomes obvious it's a hit piece to promote the author's book. Uh... that's a joke. FTA: > By the way, an amusing aside: a few years ago my colleague Oren Nimni and I wrote a parody of nonsensical academic grand theory called Blueprints for a Sparkling Tomorrow... I'm not sure what to make of your inability to distinguish a parody of Grand Theory hucksterism from the real thing. Is this some kind of meta-commentary?

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
buboard 8y ago
> that's a joke. So ? it's still a hit piece that ridicules the same stuff. Probably not for promotion though, i dont think anyone would want to buy it. Apart from vague opinionated irony , there is little in arguments here, and from my skim reading many are false (such as he talks unintelligibly)