> One thing I find fascinating about the article is that it's assumed the cleverness was the code written to automate. This is incorrect; the cleverness is in n

> One thing I find fascinating about the article is that it's assumed the cleverness was the code written to automate. This is incorrect; the cleverness is in noticing when a task can be automated. Typically, the code itself is trivial. I thought about this too. Pretty much everything I've automated turned out to be way easier than I assumed and I ended up feeling dumb for not realizing I could have saved myself time by doing it sooner.