3 ms·
I am willing to concede that OCaml is a small language (Having not used it, I dont have any evidence for or against). As for C, I was looking at small purely f
by dman 8y ago
I am willing to concede that OCaml is a small language (Having not used it, I dont have any evidence for or against).
As for C, I was looking at small purely from the views of a new comer who is using a book to come upto speed with a language. You can write the programs from c books as is in a simple text editor and just compile / run them. C Books dont spend a huge amount of focus on arbitrary textual macros so in practice you do not run into macros as a newcomer.
- lmm 8y agoI'm not trying to push OCaml specifically, I'm just using it as an example of a "normal" language. I'd consider most languages (e.g. Python, TCL, Ruby, Java, Lisp, Haskell...) to be "smaller" than C; indeed the only languages I can think of that feel "bigger" are C++ and Perl.