4 ms·
1. Less boilerplate, so you can focus on your algorithm; best practices built in, so you might be surprised at how your speed and accuracy may improve 2. Very
by jph00 8y ago
1. Less boilerplate, so you can focus on your algorithm; best practices built in, so you might be surprised at how your speed and accuracy may improve
2. Very close integration with PyTorch. fastai is designed to extend PyTorch, not hide it. E.g. fastai uses standard PyTorch Datasets for data, but then provides a number of pre-defined Datasets for common tasks
3. fastai is not slower than PyTorch, since PyTorch is handling all the computation. It'll othen be faster than your handwritten PyTorch however, since we went to a lot of effort to use performant algorithms.
- screye 8y agoThanks for replying. From appearance alone, everything about fast.ai seems to be positive with no obvious negatives over native pytorch. I often require to train baselines for my projects. That will be the perfect place to start using fast.ai. I am sold. I have heard a few people lament the lack of keras in pytorch. Fast.ai also appears to take care of that. Thanks for the great work.