3 ms·
The argument was implicit: he called it a conspiracy theory. A conspiracy theory is an explanation of an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy [...] wit
by mtarnovan 8y ago
The argument was implicit: he called it a conspiracy theory.
A conspiracy theory is an explanation of an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy [...] without credible evidence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
- rando444 8y agoThat's not an argument. You should look at the example in the wikipedia article I posted. The poster formed an opinion based on observations and gave his reasons for doing so. If you disagree with his observations, the best way to do so is to provide your reasons for disagreeing with his analysis.
- ectospheno 8y agoWhat analysis? OP basically said "these words are big" and from that determined it was written by others.