having read the whole presentation, I'm very surprised to read the article. What's on the slides doesn't match the content of the article. Also, I find it iron

having read the whole presentation, I'm very surprised to read the article. What's on the slides doesn't match the content of the article. Also, I find it ironic that he mentions people fired because of similar opinions on the slide 24, and then gets suspended for the same reason. Could we at least have an honest, open discussion about the content rather than silencing the (currently) non-mainstream views?