4 ms·

What were the links posted? They were flagged and removed.

• paradite 8y ago
  Just some links to articles in Chinese websites that talks about defaults recently: http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/doc-ifyteqtq9368408.shtml?cre=tianyi&mod=pcpager_fintoutiao&loc=1&r=9&doct=0&rfunc=100&tj=none&tr=9 http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/do... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmnq8345092.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmn... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/doc-ihcyszrz8981691.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/do... http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html
  • pas 8y ago
    I interpreted OP's comment as meaning that this particular reuters link is censored, not necessarily all URLs with the same semantic content. Probably censors are not vigilant enough.
    • notabot 8y ago
      The context of the NYT article is that bad news in Chinese media is censored. GP already said "the kind of ...", which was not about a specific piece or a specific link, so it would be natural for me to interpret GP's comment as "the semantic content about defaults is censored in China", which is not true according to @paradite.
    • paradite 8y ago
      Right. I didn't see that you could interpret it that way. Apologies for not stating that assumption.