5 ms·

The example is inaccurate, or rather false and misleading.

King-Aaron 8y ago
Welllllll I don't really think that was the point of the comment, rather it was showing an example of what content has been blocked.
- paradite 8y ago
  I'm not sure where the misunderstanding is. The article is about censoring economic news. The top comment suggests an example of economic news that is censored. Anyone reading the comments would assume that the example news is indeed censored. However, that was not the case, as shown in the links I provided. (If they were censored, the pages would have been taken down retrospectively) I'm pointing out that example is a false accusation of the content being censored.
  - mads 8y ago
    What were the links posted? They were flagged and removed.
    - paradite 8y ago
      Just some links to articles in Chinese websites that talks about defaults recently: http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/doc-ifyteqtq9368408.shtml?cre=tianyi&mod=pcpager_fintoutiao&loc=1&r=9&doct=0&rfunc=100&tj=none&tr=9 http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/do... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmnq8345092.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmn... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/doc-ihcyszrz8981691.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/do... http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html
      - pas 8y ago
        I interpreted OP's comment as meaning that this particular reuters link is censored, not necessarily all URLs with the same semantic content. Probably censors are not vigilant enough.
        notabot 8y ago
        The context of the NYT article is that bad news in Chinese media is censored. GP already said "the kind of ...", which was not about a specific piece or a specific link, so it would be natural for me to interpret GP's comment as "the semantic content about defaults is censored in China", which is not true according to @paradite.
        paradite 8y ago
        Right. I didn't see that you could interpret it that way. Apologies for not stating that assumption.

Welllllll I don't really think that was the point of the comment, rather it was showing an example of what content has been blocked.

paradite 8y ago
I'm not sure where the misunderstanding is. The article is about censoring economic news. The top comment suggests an example of economic news that is censored. Anyone reading the comments would assume that the example news is indeed censored. However, that was not the case, as shown in the links I provided. (If they were censored, the pages would have been taken down retrospectively) I'm pointing out that example is a false accusation of the content being censored.
- mads 8y ago
  What were the links posted? They were flagged and removed.
  - paradite 8y ago
    Just some links to articles in Chinese websites that talks about defaults recently: http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/doc-ifyteqtq9368408.shtml?cre=tianyi&mod=pcpager_fintoutiao&loc=1&r=9&doct=0&rfunc=100&tj=none&tr=9 http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/do... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmnq8345092.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmn... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/doc-ihcyszrz8981691.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/do... http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html
    - pas 8y ago
      I interpreted OP's comment as meaning that this particular reuters link is censored, not necessarily all URLs with the same semantic content. Probably censors are not vigilant enough.
      - notabot 8y ago
        The context of the NYT article is that bad news in Chinese media is censored. GP already said "the kind of ...", which was not about a specific piece or a specific link, so it would be natural for me to interpret GP's comment as "the semantic content about defaults is censored in China", which is not true according to @paradite.
      - paradite 8y ago
        Right. I didn't see that you could interpret it that way. Apologies for not stating that assumption.