4 ms·
> How about stopping the baseless accusations thrown at China? Apologies, but all the links you posted are in chinese, and google translate just turns them int
by King-Aaron 8y ago
> How about stopping the baseless accusations thrown at China?
Apologies, but all the links you posted are in chinese, and google translate just turns them into mostly garbage so Im struggling with the context of your comment.
But I'm not sure what this issue here is, the user above you pointed out "the kind of information being censored" as an example of what's being discussed in the parent article, and that seems unrelated to the argument "Stop throwing baseless accusations about X".
Is the problem with the accusation that China is censoring economic information, or is it that the default rate as used in this example is inaccurate?
- paradite 8y agoThe example is inaccurate, or rather false and misleading.
- King-Aaron 8y agoWelllllll I don't really think that was the point of the comment, rather it was showing an example of what content has been blocked.
- paradite 8y agoI'm not sure where the misunderstanding is. The article is about censoring economic news. The top comment suggests an example of economic news that is censored. Anyone reading the comments would assume that the example news is indeed censored. However, that was not the case, as shown in the links I provided. (If they were censored, the pages would have been taken down retrospectively) I'm pointing out that example is a false accusation of the content being censored.
- mads 8y agoWhat were the links posted? They were flagged and removed.
- paradite 8y agoJust some links to articles in Chinese websites that talks about defaults recently: http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/doc-ifyteqtq9368408.shtml?cre=tianyi&mod=pcpager_fintoutiao&loc=1&r=9&doct=0&rfunc=100&tj=none&tr=9 http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-04-13/do... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmnq8345092.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/2018-08-31/doc-ihinpmn... http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/doc-ihcyszrz8981691.shtml http://finance.sina.com.cn/money/bond/research/2018-06-15/do... http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.jrj.com.cn/2018/09/30133825154607.shtml http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html http://bond.hexun.com/2018-08-01/193639187.html
- pas 8y agoI interpreted OP's comment as meaning that this particular reuters link is censored, not necessarily all URLs with the same semantic content. Probably censors are not vigilant enough.
- notabot 8y agoThe context of the NYT article is that bad news in Chinese media is censored. GP already said "the kind of ...", which was not about a specific piece or a specific link, so it would be natural for me to interpret GP's comment as "the semantic content about defaults is censored in China", which is not true according to @paradite.
- paradite 8y agoRight. I didn't see that you could interpret it that way. Apologies for not stating that assumption.