3 ms·
This is amazing for secure code reviews. I have already spun up and instance and am demoing it for my team. Is it possible to get Jira integration? Can you te
by k4ch0w 8y ago
This is amazing for secure code reviews. I have already spun up and instance and am demoing it for my team.
Is it possible to get Jira integration?
Can you test bitbucket.org connection with credentials some place I am not seeing? I can't tell what is causing it to fail.
Is there a way to add markers in the code and then a queue to clear it? I.E I mark hotspots in the code and want a developer to review them or edit them.
I think a current pain point would be no flat file upload. I understand you only need the .git directory and this was designed with a developer in mind. A lot of times when doing a secure code review we don't get credentials, we just get a current clone of the code. I just tried to do it using the instructions and had some trouble ended up just cloning it on the host machine. I usually get a zip/tar of the code.
Another feature that would be awesome is export a search to a CSV file. I could script together something for Jira integration with that pretty quickly. Something to get the line affected #, branch and filepath.
The subscription to searches was a brilliant idea. I wish I thought of it.
SSO already integrated? Nice man!
I'd make the discussions default too, I discovered that after playing with it for a bit. It's an awesome feature.
I look forward to seeing more of it.
- slimsag 8y agoHeya, I'm the Sourcegrapher working on the discussions feature[1]. It's great to hear your are enjoying it. We're looking for users to help drive the direction of the feature as it matures and really influence what we work on next with it, so if you're up for it I'd really love to get your feedback on it (as much as you'd be willing to provide). :) Jira integration -> We're working on it! Mind commenting on https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/141 https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/141 ? Markers in the code -> If you could archive or dismiss the inline discussion threads (so that they no longer show up in the inline view) would that work well? Flat file upload -> Could you file a feature request for this at https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/new/choose https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph/issues/new/choose with some more details on how e.g. you would wish to give Sourcegraph access to the code? Exporting search to CSV -> It might be pretty easy to write something like this with our `src` CLI tool: https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli https://github.com/sourcegraph/src-cli You can get JSON output via e.g. `src search -json 'repogroup:sample error'` Hope to hear more from you! :) [1] https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/discuss-code-and-docs-in-repositories https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/discuss-code-and-docs-in-...