> I.e. your position is that state should be able to compel individual to run unwanted business? I'm sure the state would be fine if he just opened access to t

> I.e. your position is that state should be able to compel individual to run unwanted business? I'm sure the state would be fine if he just opened access to the beach to everyone for free. No need to operate any business. This question about being "compel[led] to run unwanted business" is just a smokescreen to obscure a campaign to deny the public its rights.