Sure my argument is * He bought the business with full knowledge of what his obligations were under Californian law. * There is a huge difference between comp

Sure my argument is * He bought the business with full knowledge of what his obligations were under Californian law. * There is a huge difference between compelling an individual to run a business, and compelling him to not restrict access to the public. * This lawsuit was not because he stopped maintaining the road, or the bathrooms, but because he closed a road that allowed people access to the beach. * Government compels people to do all sorts of things, and not closing off public access to a beach after you paid $32 million for a private beach house seems like one of the least onerous.