I think you read it correctly. As described in the post, it's a "technical test", not a product. The gap between a "test" and a product is huge. I don't think

I think you read it correctly. As described in the post, it's a "technical test", not a product. The gap between a "test" and a product is huge. I don't think it's wise to dump resources into building a product based on unproven technology.