3 ms·
[deleted]
by shobith 8y ago
[deleted]
- jazzyk 8y agoYou don;t get it. Access to coast is guaranteed to be public in most countries I have visited - it simply is not for sale. This is about super-rich people demanding special treatment, saying - EVERYTHING is for sale, it is just a question of price. He should be in jail for repeatedly violating the law.
- sverige 8y agoIt's happening throughout the West with access to rivers and lakes that billionaires have "purchased." It is definitely a cancer since it weakens the idea that some real estate is public domain. (And I'm an unironic capitalist saying this.)
- gamblor956 8y agoKhosla bought the property knowing it was subject to the public access easement (and it was priced accordingly).
- fiter 8y agoIf someone could find evidence to support this, I think this would be even more damaging for his persona. All this fight "for principle" that comes down to $X million.
- URSpider94 8y agoThese easements aren’t usually documented, but it would be blindingly obvious to anyone who bought the property, especially anyone with an attorney worthy of representing a billionaire. He absolutely knew, and figured he could bully, buy, litigate and delay his way out of it. I’m betting the whole strategy was written up before the sale was complete.