You can think of a system in which farms are just not built in places with potential water scarcity, but built to use renewable water sources for their plant gr

You can think of a system in which farms are just not built in places with potential water scarcity, but built to use renewable water sources for their plant growth. My point: If you build a company in a location which is unviable in the long term, should you be subsidized as to not move to a more viable location? I think such subsidies are unviable in any but the short term, and are counterproductive for every other party involved.