4 ms·
This is exactly what the criticism linked in TFA explores: http://www.pnas.org/content/108/42/E833.long http://www.pnas.org/content/108/42/E833.long A related
by claytonjy 8y ago
This is exactly what the criticism linked in TFA explores: http://www.pnas.org/content/108/42/E833.long http://www.pnas.org/content/108/42/E833.long
A related problem here is that even though the original study was bad for many reasons, it continues to be cited much more than the refutation.
- mark212 8y agoI missed that one. Read the other refutation.
- 99052882514569 8y agoAnd mentioned in podcasts by people[1] who really, seriously, obviously should know much better (based on how famous and otherwise competent they seem to be). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Sapolsky https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Sapolsky