> It wouldn't stop those things though, there will always be a weak point. If that is your argument, then I don't think anyone can convince you. > What it wou

> It wouldn't stop those things though, there will always be a weak point. If that is your argument, then I don't think anyone can convince you. > What it would do is erode the rights and freedoms of law abiding citizens (something that terrorists seem to want). That's not how Wikipedia (and I myself) define terrorism: > Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror among masses of people; or fear to achieve a financial, political, religious or ideological aim.