3 ms·

Here's a good explanation of the flaws in the original study: http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16823/jdm16823.html http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16823/jdm16823.html It'

Here's a good explanation of the flaws in the original study: http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16823/jdm16823.html http://journal.sjdm.org/16/16823/jdm16823.html It's primarily due to "a statistical artifact resulting from favorable rulings taking longer than unfavorable ones".

baybal2 8y ago
Not much of an artifact - during my BLAW101 I was told that in North America judges really don't like people intentionally dragging on cases, but can't do much about them other than give the innuendo of them raising white flag - something along lines "you babbled for 3 hours, for sure we have enough argument from you that the worst case scenario ruling is now out of the question"