4 ms·
This is a nuanced topic (border security), and while I think there's slippery slopes (and their associated fallacies) in both directions, it is true to say that
by debacle 8y ago
This is a nuanced topic (border security), and while I think there's slippery slopes (and their associated fallacies) in both directions, it is true to say that you are very free to share none of those things with border security, and border security is very free to not admit you to the country.
- vorpalhex 8y agoIn most countries, border security isn't entirely free to run rampant over your basic freedoms. Privileged communications (eg client/attorney) is an extremely important basic bastion of freedom and law, and violating that (which in this case seems incidental, not intentional) is a mockery. Sure, any country is welcome to violate that norm, just the same as any country is welcome to force it's people in labor camps for insulting Dearest Leader. The rest of the world is also welcome to respond appropriately.
- debacle 8y ago> In most countries, border security isn't entirely free to run rampant over your basic freedoms. Can you give me an example of a non-EU country, or an EU country admitting a non-EU citizen, that has strict rules on how a visitor must be treated?