3 ms·
Did you even read the comment you're replying to?
by some_random 8y ago
Did you even read the comment you're replying to?
- carrja99 8y agoMy fault, I missed > even when you know how you will vote in advance.
- cortesoft 8y agoI still think you missed the point, though... the point of the finding was that the hack takes less time alone with the machine than the average voter takes to vote.... therefore, a hacker won't arouse suspicion while they are doing the hack. It doesn't matter if there are things a voter can do to speed up voting, it only matters that it still wouldn't be suspicious if someone was in the booth for 2 minutes.