3 ms·
1) Copy-past works just fine, at least with flex 3 text or textarea controls 2) Saving the swf is easy, and you can view it any time 3) Images are usually embed
by marketer 18y ago
1) Copy-past works just fine, at least with flex 3 text or textarea controls
2) Saving the swf is easy, and you can view it any time
3) Images are usually embedded, and you can get them with a resource viewer
4) Copy image location - this is not necessary, as images are usually embedded
5) flash supports url fragments for navigate (path after #), so as long as the flash site uses fragments, it is bookmarkable
6) open in new tab works
I'm curious where you got this misinformation, anyway.
- 0x44 18y agoOpen in new tab only works to open the flash page in a new tab, subsequent browsing within the flash page does not allow one to open in a new tab.
- apu 18y agoThe difference is that for flash websites, the developer has to actively be 'nice' to allow these things (default=not accessible), whereas with html+css+javascript, the developer has to actively be obnoxious to NOT allow these things (default=accessible).
- Goladus 18y agoA basic understanding of flash, computers, combined with browsing the web and making observations and deductions. 1) With HTML you don't have to use textarea controls. 2) Saving an SWF is not trivial. 3) How much of your target audience really bothers to find a resource viewer? 4) It's necessary because your users don't have a resource viewer. 5) So the flash developer has to know what 'url fragments' are in order to make portions of the app bookmarkable. 6) I can't think of a flash app where open in new tab works. Obviously it is not trivial to implement