3 ms·
You could also argue that it was Republican's refusal to address the needs of immigrants that lost them California. But only American citizens can vote. And I
by atomi 8y ago
You could also argue that it was Republican's refusal to address the needs of immigrants that lost them California.
But only American citizens can vote. And I can't seem to find any data on the increase of the California population from naturalized citizens.
- Gibbon1 8y agoAfter Prop 187 about a million Mexican resident aliens got their citizenship. That also coincided with a hard turn towards fascism by the Republican party under Gingrich.
- PKop 8y agoNot sure what you're confused about, and OP was talking about legal immigration. Prior to 65 immigration act, California was over 90% white. By 2010, non-hispanic white was down to %40, hispanic ~%37%. That is a huge demographic change. Hispanics nationally vote for Democratic/liberal politicians on avg. 70%. So.. ergo, the dramatic blue turn California has taken politically can be accounted for by drastic change in demographics. Your first statement is just restating the same premise: a dramatic change of the makeup of the electorate (whatever their "needs" or preferred political policies) changed the outcome of elections. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_California section: "Population of California according to racial/ethnic group 1960–2010"