4 ms·
Article in Nature Communications: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06337-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06337-4 Press release from Radb
by gjm11 8y ago
Article in Nature Communications: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06337-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-06337-4
Press release from Radboud University: https://www.ru.nl/english/news-agenda/news/vm/imm/solid-state-physics/2018/scientists-discover-new-mechanism-information/ https://www.ru.nl/english/news-agenda/news/vm/imm/solid-stat...
The phys.org "article" is word-for-word the same as the press release, except that they added a link to an earlier phys.org "article" on a related topic, which in turn was word-for-word the same as this press release: https://actu.epfl.ch/news/a-step-closer-to-single-atom-data-storage/ https://actu.epfl.ch/news/a-step-closer-to-single-atom-data-... apart from, again, a link at the bottom to an earlier phys.org "article" which, well, you get the idea.
- jacobush 8y agoActually I don't get the idea - are you saying the whole thing is birds of a feather or that the Nature article is the real deal?
- gjm11 8y agoSorry, I should have been more explicit. I'm saying that every phys.org article is like this: they reproduce a press release without adding anything to it, except for some links to other stuff on phys.org (which in turn are just copies of press releases together with more within-phys.org links).