3 ms·
I'm not sure I would call that "browsable," but it seems like there is a lot of great work that's gone into cataloging the philosophers, ideas, and connections.
by jaysonelliot 8y ago
I'm not sure I would call that "browsable," but it seems like there is a lot of great work that's gone into cataloging the philosophers, ideas, and connections.
A less experimental and more usable UI would make this a great site.
- visarga 8y agoWiki style, with links. The arcs linking concepts look nice but make browsing impossible.
- tenaciousDaniel 8y agoI (kinda) disagree. For me, the wiki style doesn't feel as browsable as it should. Not sure why. I personally feel like I need some visual map of the connections between ideas. You're right that the attempt here falls short in many ways but I'm glad someone is giving it a shot.
- visarga 8y agoVisual maps (mind-maps) don't scale well over 20-30 items because the model becomes hard to grasp and lots of scrolling is necessary. Such models are nice while they are small. I'd love to see a cross between a wiki and a mind-map where parts of a larger mind-map are represented on individual pages of the wiki, with links between them. I'd use such a tool to organise my ideas / learning.