4 ms·
#1, good call! #2, usually I am 100% in agreement. But referer vs referrer in the HTTP spec is a special case. I chose to do this as referer is misspelled in th
by braxxox 8y ago
#1, good call!
#2, usually I am 100% in agreement. But referer vs referrer in the HTTP spec is a special case. I chose to do this as referer is misspelled in the spec itself.
- partycoder 8y agoDoes the misspelled version prevailed over the correct version if both are defined?
- braxxox 8y agoIt does as it is the correct header name.
- wild_preference 8y agoIf both keys exist, then it’s an even bigger signal of user mistake. Are you going to fail then? Distinction becomes pretty arbitrary. As a user, I’d rather have a failure at boot time if I got it wrong. Just because I had a typo once doesn’t mean I always make it. What if I tried to transform my own config? I’d have to follow special case your referers property like you did to keep it consistent.
- partycoder 8y agoMay be a reasonable choice but I recommend just throwing.