3 ms·
Yes, that’s true. It’s also because the view is: published == valid. An idea I had once was to say: the group that repeats or falsifies the results of a paper
by baxtr 8y ago
Yes, that’s true. It’s also because the view is: published == valid.
An idea I had once was to say: the group that repeats or falsifies the results of a paper will be published in the same journal. So this motivate people to piggy back on high profile publications. Unsure if it’ll work though
- chrisfinazzo 8y agoThe idea that just because it was published makes it valid is insane on so many levels. Usually, it is required - or at least good sense - to address limitations and draw conclusions based on your findings. This assertion flies in the face of that practice.