For the "Issue Triage" analysis I would say lines_added,lines_remove,commits,number_issues_involved_in would be interesting to see as well. For example caphrim

For the "Issue Triage" analysis I would say lines_added,lines_remove,commits,number_issues_involved_in would be interesting to see as well. For example caphrim007 is number 5 in commits over that period but added 5x as many lines of code as next closest committer. However, the code maybe against a new under-used feature so the actual end-user usage could be low. It would also be interesting to juxtapose top committers commit graphs against issue assignment and resolution timeline. When does issue triage by top committers wax and wane? Do big commits (new features) overlap with issue assignment/resolution dates? Does high volume issue assignment/resolution follow big commits?