3 ms·
Github handles it better. It lets you decide whether or not to close the branch, lets you protect certain branches from being closed, etc.
by twblalock 8y ago
Github handles it better. It lets you decide whether or not to close the branch, lets you protect certain branches from being closed, etc.
- pnloyd 8y agoBitbucket I use gives you the option as a checkbox upon merging.
- greglindahl 8y agoSo, if my company has a workflow where that box should always be checked or not, and rarely overridden by the user, ...
- another-cuppa 8y agoRemember Atlassian in their infinite wisdom renamed the on-premises product formerly known as Stash to Bitbucket despite being a completely different code base to Bitbucket.com. I think they are talking about Bitbucket.com.
- leoedin 8y agoThe bitbucket.com website gives a check box to select whether to close a branch though. Unless you mean that the on-premises product doesn't?
- another-cuppa 8y agoThe on-prem one I use has checkbox when you merge. It's unticked by default.
- gpm 8y agoThe on prem version I was using a month ago had a checkbox, ticked the last way you checked it by default. So if you merged feature -> develop -> master and remembered to delete feature it would delete develop by default as well...