LOL @ "North Virginia" . Also, when he says R^2, is he talking about Pearson's correlation coefficient? That paragraph is confusing, and in the next one he admi

LOL @ "North Virginia" . Also, when he says R^2, is he talking about Pearson's correlation coefficient? That paragraph is confusing, and in the next one he admits being mystified by the idea of gaussian distributions... I guess I should stop trying to make sense of the technical elements of this article.