5 ms·
I respectfully disagree. It is as relevant today as it was in 2000, and the date shows up in the status bar when you hover over the link.
by photon_off 16y ago
I respectfully disagree. It is as relevant today as it was in 2000, and the date shows up in the status bar when you hover over the link.
- almost 16y agoYes, but given that it's a fascinating article written in 2000 and available on the net we can assume a lot of people will have already read it. If you stick (2000) after the title that helps those who have from having to click through. I say this as someone who hadn't read the article and has just done so due to this link. Plus, I usually see a year after a title as indicating quality. It says that the article isn't about some current fad but is a genuinely good/interesting read.
- photon_off 16y agoI would suspect that people who have read it would realize this from the title, not the year. And, again, the year is visible when you hover over the link. There's not much more to discuss. Let's just agree to disagree.