4 ms·
I am simply referring to the result data from the study. I fail to see how that is disingenuous. You say Scala and Haskell killed it in the study, and you are
by erokar 8y ago
I am simply referring to the result data from the study. I fail to see how that is disingenuous.
You say Scala and Haskell killed it in the study, and you are right, they were the third and second best language respectively with regards to low rates of bugs. Perhaps you also happened to notice (but failed to mention) what language did best of all: Clojure, a dynamically typed language.
- cix_pkez 8y agoI leave it to future readers to decide who's missing the point between the two of us.
- int_19h 8y agoI think the point is that all else being equal, static typing is better. But obviously all else is not very equal at all, and so in practice you can have a very well-designed dynamic language beating static ones on this metric.