3 ms·

I'm not talking about Silicon Valley, I'm talking about all other industries in all countries, most Silicon Valley companies are banned in China, stop vilifying

I'm not talking about Silicon Valley, I'm talking about all other industries in all countries, most Silicon Valley companies are banned in China, stop vilifying Silicon Valley. I'm sure these organizations are great and are doing wonderful work but they are not government entities and Google has no obligation to respond to them, further more these are non profits, attaching themselves to a high profile subject like Google gives them more exposure and potentially more donations.

math_and_stuff 8y ago
I hate to bicker, but, according to Google's own AI Principles [0], they have a self-imposed obligation to respond to serious human rights concerns. They promised not to pursue "technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of [...] human rights". [0] https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/ https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/
- someonelse17 8y ago
  It's debatable if the China thing applies, in any case congressional committees need not interfere.
justtopost 8y ago
All your comments have at least two things in common. 1. A seemingly willful disreguard for the facts. 2. Another striking commonality that I can't aledge but a trip through your comments will bear out. The topic always seems to be common. The timing of the account creation is of course purely circumstantial. Draw your own conclusions, but to say that you are constructively adding to discussion would be a reach.
- someonelse17 8y ago
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
- dang 8y ago
  "Can't allege" is an oxymoron. Please don't insinuate astroturfing in comment threads. If you think you're seeing abuse, email us at hn@ycombinator.com so we can investigate. We ban accounts when we find evidence of abuse (I've banned that one), but just dropping a comment in the thread makes it unlikely that we'll ever see it. It also poisons discussion in the case where the insinuation wrong, which is far more common. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

math_and_stuff 8y ago

I hate to bicker, but, according to Google's own AI Principles [0], they have a self-imposed obligation to respond to serious human rights concerns. They promised not to pursue "technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of [...] human rights". [0] https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/ https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/

someonelse17 8y ago
It's debatable if the China thing applies, in any case congressional committees need not interfere.

justtopost 8y ago

All your comments have at least two things in common. 1. A seemingly willful disreguard for the facts. 2. Another striking commonality that I can't aledge but a trip through your comments will bear out. The topic always seems to be common. The timing of the account creation is of course purely circumstantial. Draw your own conclusions, but to say that you are constructively adding to discussion would be a reach.

someonelse17 8y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
dang 8y ago
"Can't allege" is an oxymoron. Please don't insinuate astroturfing in comment threads. If you think you're seeing abuse, email us at hn@ycombinator.com so we can investigate. We ban accounts when we find evidence of abuse (I've banned that one), but just dropping a comment in the thread makes it unlikely that we'll ever see it. It also poisons discussion in the case where the insinuation wrong, which is far more common. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html