3 ms·
The author is attempting to find the opportunity costs of his purchases retroactively. It's very important to weight the opportunity cost of something before ma
by andre3k1 16y ago
The author is attempting to find the opportunity costs of his purchases retroactively. It's very important to weight the opportunity cost of something before making the purchase.
The method that he uses to elicit the values is extremely interesting. He locks the items in storage to realize their true value to him.
In the process he discovers a major economic principle. I can't remember that exact term used to describe the situation, but I think it deals with Willingness To Accept (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness_to_accept http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willingness_to_accept). In summary, the principle states that one tends to increase the value placed on a good if he owns it. For example, you bargain with a salesman for a hat. He brings the price down to $10. A well-dressed man sees you walking out of the store with your newly purchased hat. He likes it, so he makes you an offer for $10. You will likely not accept because the hat is now worth more to you than just $10.
Overall, the article itself is presented in a motivating fashion shedding some light on these economic issues.
- aston 16y agoYou were looking for the Endowment Effect (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment_effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endowment_effect).
- andre3k1 16y agoYeap, that's it! Thanks bud.
- joshkaufman 16y agoAnother related concept: Total Cost of Ownership - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_cost_of_ownership http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_cost_of_ownership
- Luc 16y agoIsn't it obvious in this example that selling the hat is a waste of time and potentially money? Much better to tell the well-dressed guy to go and haggle himself, so HE's the one taking on the risk of not getting the price down to $10 again, and HE's the one spending his time. I mean, you just bought a hat, why sell it for no profit?