>"about 30 percent... involve a beneficial owner or purchaser representative that was also the subject of a previous suspicious activity report." There are so

>"about 30 percent... involve a beneficial owner or purchaser representative that was also the subject of a previous suspicious activity report." There are so many issues with conclusions like this but the simplest question to ask first is, "What's the SAR rate for the equivalent tronche of people who aren't involved in money laundering?". This analysis probably suffers from Berkson's Paradox: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daiEkxSaRlU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daiEkxSaRlU