4 ms·

You realize that your position is, effectively, circular, right? Your argument is that readers can't determine an article's bias by reading it. There seems to b

• AllegedAlec 8y ago
  > You realize that your position is, effectively, circular, right? It's circular in the sense that because a bias is perceived from an organisation, the content of that organisation is attributed a certain bias by the reader, which reinforces the reader's idea of that organisation's bias. Although that is, indeed circular, it's also how humans tend to perceive and process information. > Your argument is that readers can't determine an article's bias by reading it. I fail to see how that is true. If I were to, for example, write an article about a contentious subject, say, for example the positive or negative effect of Trump on America's economy, how, from just the article itself, would you be able to determine whether it was a biased or not? > There seems to be a definition of bias you're using here that can't be measured. I didn't make claims about the measurability of bias.