It would be great if you could convince large tech companies to use work sample tests, but I just don't see that happening. So in that sense maybe work sample t

It would be great if you could convince large tech companies to use work sample tests, but I just don't see that happening. So in that sense maybe work sample tests can be a differentiator attracting candidates that don't want to spend a few weeks doing Leetcode prep every time they look for a new job. On the other hand work sample tests also have drawbacks. I don't know if they're actually that much better than regular interviewing methods; I think they just contribute an orthogonal signal instead of a stronger one. I don't feel I can cheerlead them as much as you do in your first paragraph. I think in an ideal world companies would allow candidates the option of choosing either their work sample or their resume-blind, standardized interview gauntlet. People with a lot of interviewing anxiety could self-elect a work sample option. But if you impose a work sample on every candidate I think you'll reduce your pool of available hires. I was offered a work sample test recently and was told to spend about a week on it. I started working on it a little bit the first day and really enjoyed the exercise. But I was also interviewing with at least five other companies at the same time; I simply didn't have the time between work and traveling for onsites to really commit to the work sample.