3 ms·
I appreciate that these decisions can seem easy, but broadly do you want a private company deciding what can be on the internet, or do you want that decision ma
by zackbloom 8y ago
I appreciate that these decisions can seem easy, but broadly do you want a private company deciding what can be on the internet, or do you want that decision made by a judge with due process?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- daxorid 8y agoMatt Prince already decided "what can be on the internet" when he banned Daily Stormer. As far as Cloudflare is concerned, that ship already sailed.
- jjeaff 8y agoThat's completely different really. They just stopped proxying their traffic. Daily Stormer could continue on, assuming they pay enough to handle the traffic. Turning off your domain name is a different story. You are sunk until you can regain control of it.
- jopsen 8y agoI think the issue was that the Daily Stormer communicated that the fact that cloudflare hadn't banned them was a form of support or endorsement. It seems reasonable to put a lid on that. I do see the moral dilemma though.
- johnklos 8y agoFake Adobe Flash update web sites are outside of the scope of subjectivity when it comes to free speech. Or would you like to assert otherwise?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]