3 ms·
omit any reference to the huge controversy this have generated That’s something that hasn’t happened, though. It’s a storm in a teacup, like all this stuff is.
by matthewmacleod 8y ago
omit any reference to the huge controversy this have generated
That’s something that hasn’t happened, though. It’s a storm in a teacup, like all this stuff is.
- eropple 8y agoYes, and this is important to understand for those who happen to be browsing by: there is a political faction on the internet who really would like people to believe that there is some Huge Controversy about the Contributor Covenant or about any of the principals involved or this or that. But there isn't. Sure, there are some mad people. But they are a rounding error of give-a-shit and their political position, for it is a political position--specifically, status quo regressiveness camouflaged as neutrality[0]--depends on manufacturing consent that does not exist. [0] - I have yet to see someone claim that they're "not being political" who...isn't. Or somebody claim that somebody else is "being political" when that claimant is not advocating for some nasty stuff. The world's political and somebody trying to frame "politics" as a negative is trying to get you over a barrel.