3 ms·
Both "solutions" don't address the problem of repeated class names, they just help repeating them in a correct but not less obscene way. Bloated markup cannot b
by HelloNurse 8y ago
Both "solutions" don't address the problem of repeated class names, they just help repeating them in a correct but not less obscene way. Bloated markup cannot be defended.
- naasking 8y agoYes they do, at least in a way that's no worse than every other CSS toolkit in widespread use. And there's nothing "correct" or "incorrect" about it. I suggest reading [1] if you want some real data on the usefulness of functional CSS. [1] https://hackernoon.com/full-re-write-with-tachyons-and-functional-css-a-case-study-part-1-635ccb5fb00b https://hackernoon.com/full-re-write-with-tachyons-and-funct...
- HelloNurse 8y agoI mean "correct" in the formal sense that every element gets the intended style, which is possible even with bad design and bad technology.