3 ms·

Didn't we have this discussion already earlier this year and they told us it was an unfortunate bug and that it has been fixed? Yes. Yes. We did: https://www.t

• darthoctopus 8y ago
  not relevant
  • throwawaymanbot 8y ago
    Yes.. yes it is relevant, its shows how Facebook morally and ethically operates. Who are you to tell anyone what is or what is not relevant in a public forum. I hope you are not this overbearing in real life?
  • pilif 8y ago
    I think it is relevant: back in february they made us believe that them using 2FA phone numbers for marketing purposes was a bug and today we learn that them using 2FA phone numbers for marketing purposes is a feature. So either they lied in February or they have changed their minds. Either way, I think there is value to bring this very similar discussion back to our minds.
• mellow-lake-day 8y ago
  This is not a "Bug" but a "Feature" Some things don't change: Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard Zuck: Just ask. Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one? Zuck: People just submitted it. Zuck: I don't know why. Zuck: They "trust me" Zuck: Dumb fucks.