> Is there anyone who actually thinks that what some random YouTuber says is the official word of YouTube? If the government tells YouTube which YouTube videos

> Is there anyone who actually thinks that what some random YouTuber says is the official word of YouTube? If the government tells YouTube which YouTube videos to suppress, no matter how "unimportant" the "random YouTuber", then the government is restricting both the YouTubers' speech, and YouTube's right to prioritize information as it sees fit. Just the same as if the government told newspapers which articles were allowed to appear on the front page, or which op-eds it could select. Let's turn your criticism right back around: Would that kind of regulation be tolerable to you if we were talking about conservative publications/websites, and it were a liberal government telling them what to do?