So a user who is, in absolute terms, much more politically active and damaging to this site than I am, is permitted to post freely, as long as the majority of t

So a user who is, in absolute terms, much more politically active and damaging to this site than I am, is permitted to post freely, as long as the majority of their posts are decreed by someone to be "not for ideological battle"? This is an honest question. Because the policy as you've described it so far targets the wrong users. It permits users who routinely abuse the site to promote political and ideological messages--as long as there's enough other activity to cover it up. I would like a breakdown of exactly which comments of mine have been considered ideological battle, to what extent they're considered so, and how those conclusions were reached. I believe this is fair. You stated I have "clearly" been using HN for such a purpose. Out of the now 60 total comments I've made to HN in over 3 years, with the majority of them being supported by other users, and not once before being told I've broken any guidelines, to now be told that my account is going against and has been going against guidelines is a surprise, as I stated in my previous comment.